Leadership in Holacracy

Holacracy transforms traditional management by distributing authority and fostering self-organization. Here are the key takeaways:

1. Role clarity: Each role has clear objectives, defined responsibilities, and well-established interactions with others.

2. Distributed leadership: Decisions are not driven by a hierarchy, but by structured processes and specific roles such as the facilitator and the secretary.

3. Tension management: Conflicts are resolved through defined mechanisms, notably via the “Second Link” role that connects teams.

4. Team autonomy: Leaders create a framework where teams can operate independently while staying aligned with overall objectives.

5. Tools and training: Clear tools (such as role and meeting management) and regular training help teams adapt quickly.

Aspect	Traditional management	Holacracy
Decision-making	Centralized	Distributed by role
Authority	Based on hierarchy	Based on competencies
Responsibility	Vertical	Shared

In short: Holacracy redefines leadership by emphasizing clarity, collaboration, and autonomy, while eliminating traditional hierarchical structures.

What is Holacracy? (Holacracy) - Presented by …

Key Leadership Responsibilities in Holacracy

In holacracy, leadership is shared among different actors with well-defined functions, ensuring both clarity and self-organization. Here is an overview of the main leadership responsibilities in this model.

Defining Clear Roles

Role clarity is a central pillar of leadership in holacracy. Through governance, each role is defined with:

• A clear primary purpose

• Specific domains of responsibility

• Precise expectations in terms of outcomes

• Well-established interactions with other roles

The Circle Leader Role

Also known as the First Link, the Circle Leader role is assigned by the Leader of the parent circle. This person represents their circle in the parent circle to participate in meetings and decisions.

Unlike a director or manager in a traditional pyramidal model, the Leader in Holacracy does not make all the decisions.

They can decide:

• Role assignments within their circle

• Priorities to discuss with their circle

If they are the only person in their circle, they are called a Role Leader, and can make all decisions within their domain of authority as defined by the parent circle.

Otherwise, they make decisions collaboratively with their circle using two participatory processes:

• Consent-based decision-making to create or modify a role.

• Election without candidates to elect a facilitator or secretary.

Structuring Decision-Making Processes

Once roles are defined, leaders structure decisions to ensure their effectiveness. Two key figures play a role here:

• The facilitator, who leads discussions and encourages collective collaboration.

• The secretary, who documents decisions and organizes meetings to maintain well-ordered governance.

Resolving Conflicts Within Teams

Tension management is essential for holacracy to function well. The Second Link role is crucial: it connects different circles, identifies sources of conflict, and proposes appropriate solutions to maintain smooth communication.

Encouraging Team Autonomy

Leaders create a framework where teams can operate autonomously. They provide the necessary tools and organize targeted training, fostering a continuous cycle of improvement.

Key Role	Primary Responsibility	Impact on the Organization
Facilitator	Leading discussions	Smoother decision-making
Secretary	Documentation and organization	Clarity in governance
Second Link	Liaison between circles	Coherence and internal communication

This system enables an effective organization by maximizing each person’s skills and contributions.

Fundamental Rules of Leadership in Holacracy

Distinguishing Between People and Roles

In holacracy, it is crucial to separate the person from the role they hold. This approach ensures a structured and functional organization. Each role is defined by specific responsibilities and clear limits in terms of authority, regardless of the person filling it.

To achieve this, you need to:

• Give explicit names to roles

• Precisely describe the missions associated with each role

• Clearly delineate authorized decision-making scope

“Until we have differentiated organizational roles from the people who fill them, we will have a fusion between individuals and the organization that limits both.” - Brian Robertson, HolacracyOne

This distinction facilitates a balanced sharing of authority, which is covered in the next section.

Sharing Decision-Making Power

In holacracy, power is distributed in a balanced way among roles, which represents a radical shift from traditional management models.

Aspect	Traditional Management	Holacracy
Decision-making	Centralized	Distributed by role
Authority	Based on hierarchy	Based on competencies
Responsibility	Vertical	Shared

This distribution allows teams to respond more effectively to changes and needs.

Updating Team Structure

Holacracy offers an organizational structure that evolves continuously. Teams adjust how they operate through a well-defined governance process. This ability to adapt is built on:

• Regular meetings to refine roles

• A constant process for reviewing responsibilities

• Circle autonomy within their areas of action

For this structure to remain effective, it is essential to define activities, clarify interactions between roles, and frame processes with clear rules and policies.

sbb-itb-77d9745

Tools for Leaders in Holacracy

Meeting Management

Organizing productive meetings is crucial for holacracy to work well. The right tools can simplify collective decision-making and information sharing.

Here are some useful features to look for in digital tools:

• Real-time note-taking

• Automatic generation of meeting summaries

• Decision archiving with a convenient search function

With Rolebase, for example, you simply enter notes, then click “auto-generate” to get a structured summary. This report can then be edited and easily found through the built-in search.

Role Assignment System

A good role management system should offer clear and accessible features. Here are the essential aspects to consider:

Aspect	Function
Role definition	Clarify responsibilities and authorizations
Assignment tracking	Document roles and their history
Updates	Allow adjustments as needed
Transparency	Ensure easy access to information

“Holacracy isn’t here to tell you which way to choose; it will simply force clarity around it.” - Olivier Compagne, Partner at HolacracyOne

Once roles are well defined and documented, it becomes essential to train teams so they can master the tools and work autonomously.

Team Training Methods

Training in holacracy rests on three main pillars:

• Foundational knowledge: Learning the principles of holacracy, including the distinction between roles and individuals.

• Regular practice: Participating in training sessions on governance processes and operational meetings.

• Specific skills: Developing mastery of governance tools, such as:

  • Formulating proposals
  • Managing objections
  • Updating the organizational structure

“On the surface, Holacracy is just a set of rules. But learning the rules is just the first step in adopting the new system. Beyond the surface, Holacracy incites us to think differently about how authority and accountability flow between roles.” - Olivier Compagne, Partner at HolacracyOne

Common Problems and Solutions

Managing Team Resistance

Transitioning to holacracy can trigger resistance, especially among employees accustomed to traditional hierarchical structures. This resistance often manifests as attempts to recreate old dynamics within the new system.

To ease this transition, here are some key approaches:

• Clarify expectations for each role: Precisely define the responsibilities and activities associated with each role, respecting the principle of distributed authority.

• Shift from supervision to coaching: Replace direct control practices with active support and guidance.

• Define interactions between roles: Establish clear rules for exchanges and collaboration between roles.

Traditional Action	Holacratic Approach
Supervise work	Coach and advise
Guarantee results	Define influence activities
Approve decisions	Establish clear domains and policies

Maintaining Connection Between Teams

Decentralization, if poorly managed, can lead to organizational silos. To avoid this and ensure effective collaboration, it is crucial to structure interactions between teams.

• Clarify interaction methods: Integrate suggestions and manage objections transparently.

• Prioritize coaching: Focus on support and guidance to encourage autonomy, rather than relying on direct control.

“Holacracy isn’t here to tell you which way to choose; it will simply force clarity around it.” - Olivier Compagne, Partner at HolacracyOne

Resolving Team Conflicts

In holacracy, managing conflicts requires a structured approach built on clarifying roles and responsibilities. Here are the essential steps:

1. Identify the source of conflict

Analyze whether the conflict stems from confusion around responsibilities or an attempt to encroach on a role’s authority.

2. Clarify domains of authority

Use clear policies and definitions to delineate each role’s responsibilities.

3. Establish collaboration mechanisms

Put in place transparent processes for collective decision-making and objection management, while respecting each role’s autonomy.

These approaches help manage tensions more effectively and streamline governance, thereby strengthening the holacratic system’s overall effectiveness.

Conclusion

Holacracy redefines leadership within organizations. To date, more than 1,000 companies have adopted this model, with measurable and encouraging results.

Data shows that organizations operating with holacracy achieve better results compared to traditional structures: an appreciation score of 5.33 versus 4.14, and a decrease in tasks perceived as pointless, dropping to 2.49 versus 2.78.

Here are three essential elements for a successful transition:

Autonomy and responsibility: Distributing authority is only the beginning. Each role must be clearly defined, allowing employees to work autonomously while respecting precise boundaries.

A culture built on respect: The system relies on collaboration where everyone recognizes the value of others’ contributions. Brian Robertson explains:

“Holacracy is a system of rules for anarchy, meaning a system without rulers.”

Structured support: Success requires solid internal resources and a clear framework for managing the tensions that come with change.

Adopting holacracy also means rethinking structures, establishing self-organization processes, and encouraging mutual respect.

While this approach demands significant commitment, it can lead to more agile and engaged teams, as well as a more effective organization overall. The efforts invested in this transformation can deliver concrete results, both for employees and the company as a whole.